This assumes a patient is aware they are going to die, and in some cases, they must administer the poison themselves. Arguments supporting euthanasia usually present the fact that the patient would have no cure, and no way of contributing to society in the state they are in.
They claim humanity cannot help such individuals either: all that can be done is prolonging their agony when suffering from terminal diseases, or letting them live with a defective life in the case of suffering from serious mental deviations.
Thus, they strive to share the responsibility of cutting their lives short in the presence of others, basically with doctors.
But if a person feels they want to die, they should not bring in someone to do it.
Proceeding from this point, the essay theme is to be chosen in a way to allow you to demonstrate the abilities that the tutor is expecting.
It can be your originality, imagination, the ability to construct essay sentences logically, literacy, some other qualities, etc.No person is authorized to decide whether another person should live or die except that person.In the case of an individual deciding to pass away beforehand, no one should help him or her in this deed.Yet, there are also opponents to this rationale who claim that killing is still killing, no matter what motives the murderer had, or how difficult the patient’s suffering was.One of the main questions in treating patients who cannot be cured is whether mercy killings are to be allowed legally to help end someone’s suffering—the answer should be, “No.” Euthanasia—the proper term for mercy killing—is the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain and suffering.As the T4 Program continued, handicapped people were killed with gas vans and killing centers, eventually leading to the death of 70,000 German adults.Since this campaign was clearly being used as a murderous machine to take out the unwanted, the definition of euthanasia was stretched to fit the government’s viewpoint.Euthanasia is an act of seeming mercy, and should not be allowed legally.While being justified as humane towards people who suffer and cannot live a full life, it is a murder no better than many others and different only in motives.The problem is that while Kretchmar’s killing was done by parental consent, 5,000 to 8,000 children were forcibly taken from their parents because the state decided to do so.These children were either starved to death or killed by lethal injection.