The theory rotates around hypotheses that young learners subconsciously pick up the target language similarly to acquiring their mother tongue in informal situations.
The theory rotates around hypotheses that young learners subconsciously pick up the target language similarly to acquiring their mother tongue in informal situations.In fact, this is totally different from formal learning where it is thought to be dominated by error alteration and the appearance of the grammatical rules (Krashen and Seliger,1975).Tags: Solve My Algebra Problem Step By StepOf Mice And Men EssaysPro Life EssaysUcf Essay PromptPldt Business PlansAgricultural Farming Business PlanPublishing Company Business PlanFun Essays To Write
These monitor uses vary from a learner to another, with different degree of accomplishment.
Stephen Krashen (1981) classify the monitors into two types, Over-users who habitually try to use their Monitor, in fact, this application leads to a result of a correct language lacks a lot of natural fluency that should help the learners in their real live.
Monitor Under-users either have not intentionally learned or decide to not use their aware information of the language.
Even though the modification of errors by others has little effect on the learners, they can frequently correct themselves, later on, based on a good judgment for correctness.
Krahsen has developed his theory of second language acquirers who are assumed to have two autonomous systems for improving their ability in acquiring a second language and aware of the language learning.
So, these systems are interconnected in an explicit way where unconscious acquisition seems to be more vital as it takes place naturally.Yet, second language grammar should not be taught as it is supposed to be acquired in this natural order.This hypothesis states that acquiring an L2 will be developed automatically allowing the acquirer to monitor his new language grammatical rules and edit the mistakes unconsciously at some stage, which we will see later as “the Monitor”.The role of filtering the new input increases as the learner have sufficient comprehensive input.At later stage, when the second language learner masters a lot of L2 rules and have reached the advanced language proficiency, filtering becomes subconscious process.Teaching should give acquisition an adequate chance to flourish and make the second language learner gains a self-confidence which will help him later on to realize his mistakes and overcome them as this technique will help the acquisition process.(Brown and Hanlon, 1970; Brown, Cazden, and Bellugi, 1973).Second Language Acquisition (SLA) is a critical issue to both teachers and learners of a second language equally.Thus, teaching and learning a second language has always been of a highly important matter for linguistics who always seek language learning solutions to facilitate instructors’ job and answer educational enquires .The new “ 1” varies from a learner to a another where an “x” can pick something different form a “z ” depending on his background, interest, priority, attention and the way it is presented.Filtering the learner’s input varies from a stage to another, so a learner of a second language might not need to filter every single input at the early stage.