The thesis is specific enough to fully explore the essay, but it's not so specific that there is nothing more to write about.After the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on New York's World Trade Towers and the Pentagon, the debate surrounding racial profiling in airports intensified.
Washington’s immigration policy between 19 is the principal factor in the nation’s growing diversity today.
The federal government’s support for diversity is visible in legislation that requires school districts to offer bilingual education and which provides funding for it; It can also be seen in other laws that ban discrimination on the basis of race or national origin and that encourage employers to hire minority workers. immigration and population trends persist, the total population of so-called other races (i.e.
Many people believed that profiling was the best way to identify possible terrorists, but many others worried about violations of civil liberties.
While some airports began to target passengers based solely on their Middle Eastern origins, others instituted random searches instead.
Next, I will outline the important positions of the argument and explain why I support one of these positions.
Lastly, I will consider opposing positions and discuss why these positions are outdated.
All of these sentences build up to the essay's thesis statement.
Because it starts broad, and gradually narrows towards a focused, but not overly specific thesis.
I will conclude with some ideas for taking action and possible directions for future research.
This paper begins by providing key terms for the argument before providing background of the situation.