Literature Review Matrix Mclean

Literature Review Matrix Mclean-15
Researchers have also suggested that service quality be added to the D&M model.An instrument from the marketing literature, SERVQUAL, has become salient within the IS success literature within the past decade.Measures for the six success constructs are described and 15 pairwise associations between the success constructs are analyzed.

Tags: Essay About Self LearningProposed Research Plan1984 Totalitarianism EssayAn Essay On Christianity And Islam ComparisonsMathematicians DissertationsEssay Writing The CrucibleAssignment SheetsS In Creative Writing In CaliforniaChechnya Photo EssayPtsd Military Research Paper

This review seeks to determine whether researchers have heeded this call.

The next section explores various competing models of IS success and explains why the D&M model was chosen as the organizing framework for this literature review.

SERVQUAL measures the service quality of , after reviewing and evaluating this debate, decided to add service quality in their updated IS success model stating that ‘the changes in the role of IS over the last decade argue for a separate variable – the “service quality” dimension’ (p. Another well-known proposed modification to the D&M model is the changes offered by .

He argued that the D&M model in its original form was confusing, partly because both process and variance models were combined within the same framework.

For example, the widely cited De Lone and Mc Lean (D&M) model of IS success (1992) was updated a decade later based on a review of the empirical and conceptual literature on IS success that was published during this period ().

This past research has helped the field better understand IS success, but more needs to be done.The final section outlines the implications of this body of research for both practitioners and researchers interested in assessing information system success.) to explain why some IS are more readily accepted by users than others.Acceptance, however, is not equivalent to success, although acceptance of an information system is a necessary precondition to success.However, these six variables are not studied a portion of the IS success model (i.e., system quality, information quality, use, and user satisfaction).In their evaluation, they modified the construct, use, because they ‘conjectured that the underlying success construct that researchers have been trying to tap is Usefulness, not Use’ (p. Seddon and Kiew's concept of usefulness is equivalent to the idea of perceived usefulness in TAM by responded that, even in mandatory systems, there can still be considerable variability of use and therefore the variable use deserves to be retained.Using the technique of a qualitative literature review, this research reviews 180 papers found in the academic literature for the period 1992–2007 dealing with some aspect of IS success.Using the six dimensions of the D&M model – system quality, information quality, service quality, use, user satisfaction, and net benefits – 90 empirical studies were examined and the results summarized.Therefore, this paper examines the research related to IS success to determine what is known and what still needs to be learned for utilitarian IS in an organizational context.This qualitative literature review identified three objectives for improving the current understanding of the literature in this domain.A description of the methods used to obtain and classify the research, as well as a more detailed description of the literature review, is also provided.The results of this literature review are then presented, organized by the constructs contained in the D&M IS success model as well as the relationships between the constructs.


Comments Literature Review Matrix Mclean

The Latest from ©